| March 1972 The leading article in   the March, 1972 issue of Tai-oan Kau-hoe Kong-Po (the then monthly, now weekly,   magazine of the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan), was written by Rev. Dr. C. M.   Kao, PCT Former General Secretary (1970-1989), concerning the "Statement on the   National Fate". The three pages following this article featured photostatic   copies and translations of responses to the Statement, which had been received   from overseas bodies such as the Vatican, the Department of State of the U.S.A.,   World Vision, the National Christian Council of Japan, the Presbyterian Church   in Canada. A translation of Rev. C. M. Kao's article follows: STATEMENT ON OUR NATIONAL   FATEMotivation Based on   Faith and Theology
 After the Presbyterian   Church in Taiwan published its "Statement on Our National Fate" on the 29th   December, 1971 we received responses from many quarters. In my capacity as   General Secretary of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan,   I would like to express deep gratitude to all those inside and outside the   Church who have offered us their comments. In order that all our friends, who   are concerned about the "National Fate" statement, may have a better   understanding that the Church's motive in producing the "Statement on Our   National Fate" was founded on faith and theology, I am taking this opportunity   to report and explain several points: 1. We are extremely grateful   to many friends, who, by their positive support of the Statement, have given us   great encouragement and comfort. Certainly, Christians living in a time of   national distress should be able to speak out in more than simply polite terms.   In the past we have usually accepted "Thou shalt not offend anyone" as the first   commandment, and have disregarded the responsibility which Christians ought to   have to society and the nation. This Statement is founded on the conviction of   our Christian faith that Christians have such a responsibility. 2. Should the Church get   involved in political matters? After the Statement was issued it caused many   people to raise this question. Since the Reformation, the development of modern   history and the trend toward the separation of politics and religion, the Church   has indeed not become bound up in politics again as it was in the Middle Ages.   Except for a few extremely conservative groups, however, most orthodox   Protestant churches have encouraged their members to be responsible citizens and   to participate in constructive activities in society and politics, and thus to   be "the light of the world" and "the salt of the earth". This shows that   individual Christians do have a responsibility in the rise and fall of   nations. But should the corporate   Church, which acts in the name of Christ, keep absolute silence on social and   political issues? Not necessarily, as in the following two situations, (i) When   political power from without violates the nature of the Church and the carrying   out of her mission on earth, and when, (ii) similarly, political power from   without violates human rights, that is, the dignity of human   existence. Therefore, looking at it   from the point of view of Christian faith and ethics, if the two situations   cited above should occur (or even have the possibility of occurring), that is,   if the Church's life and human rights are violated, then (i) the Church cannot   but contend vigorously for the truth of the Gospel and its own life, and (ii)   also fight to protect God-given human rights, for the origin of human rights   lies in man's having been created in the image of God (Gen. 1:26-27). When the   Church of Christ in either of these two cases produces a statement, this kind of   statement is not basically political, but is a confession of faith. It is like   the Barmen Declaration of the Confessing Church in Germany under the Hitler   regime, and, more recently, the statements issued by Churches in South Africa   and Rhodesia. 3. Even this proposal that   the government "hold elections of all representatives to the highest government   bodies" is motivated by the belief that human rights are given by God. For we   believe that only in this way can there be any internal reforms. The government   can then merit the respect of people at home and abroad, we can recover from our   national decline, and so receive the blessing of God. To sum up, the Presbyterian   Church in Taiwan, in producing the "Statement on Our National Fate" in this   present time of crisis, has done so from the standpoint of our Christian faith,   and so it is essentially a confession of faith rather than a political   action.   |